Impeachment could bar Trump from future office
Democrats in the US House of Representative have said they will introduce an Article of Impeachment against Trump as soon as Monday, accusing him of engaging “in high Crimes and Misdemeanors by willfully inciting violence against the Government of the United States”.
In his repeated attempts to undermine the election and his directive for supporters to march on the seat of the US legislature on January 6 as Congress met to certify the victory of President-elect Joe Biden, Trump “betrayed his trust as President”, the lawmakers argue.
The move has the potential to shape the early days of Biden’s presidency, as well as the US political landscape for years to come – as Trump could be barred from holding federal office again in the future, experts said.
“The fact that that could be the consequence could be a death blow to Trump,” Alan Baron, a former special counsel to the House of Representatives during four impeachment inquiries against federal judges, told Al Jazeera.
For Trump to be impeached, the article must pass a majority vote in the House before it can be sent to the Senate for a trial. The measure then requires two-thirds support in the Senate for the president to be convicted and removed from office.
Then, Baron explained, a subsequent Senate vote, “historically involving only a simple majority”, could then bar the impeached president from ever holding public office again.
As of Sunday, the Article of Impeachment against Trump had 200 co-sponsors in the 435-seat chamber, where Democrats hold a slim majority.
With the party also set to soon take majority control of the Senate, impeachment could be a “practical” move aimed at preventing Trump from running for president again in 2024 – or a “symbolic” rebuke of his actions, said Baron.
“There’s been talk about Trump’s role as the sort of the government in exile, with regard to rallying Republicans when he’s out of office,” he said. “If he’s barred from holding any federal office, he’s kind of a toothless tiger.”
A Senate trial is unlikely to happen before Trump leaves office on January 20, however.
Even if Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell cooperated with a trial before Biden takes office – which he has said he will not – observers said it is all but logistically impossible to pull off such a high-stakes trial in the short timeframe.
Meanwhile, Democratic Representative James Clyburn on Sunday suggested that the House may wait to send the Article of Impeachment to the Senate until 100 days into Biden’s presidency, as to not mar his early days in office.
That means legislators’ hopes of barring Trump from future office will hinge on a constitutional question of whether a Senate impeachment trial can proceed after a president has already left the White House.
A Senate trial is unlikely to happen before Trump leaves office on January 20, however.
Even if Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell cooperated with a trial before Biden takes office – which he has said he will not – observers said it is all but logistically impossible to pull off such a high-stakes trial in the short timeframe.
Meanwhile, Democratic Representative James Clyburn on Sunday suggested that the House may wait to send the Article of Impeachment to the Senate until 100 days into Biden’s presidency, as to not mar his early days in office.
That means legislators’ hopes of barring Trump from future office will hinge on a constitutional question of whether a Senate impeachment trial can proceed after a president has already left the White House.
Vice President Mike Pence has said he opposed the idea of invoking the 25th Amendment, an adviser recently said, while some Republican lawmakers have urged Biden to stop Democrats’ effort to impeach, saying it risked making it difficult to unify the country after the Capitol violence.
Still, opinions could change as more evidence emerges from the riot, in particular, whether directives from the Trump administration contributed to a delayed response from federal security agents.
Impeachment by the House would also still send a message to future US leaders, Keck said.
“Even if barring Trump from holding future office falls short, then you’ve marked him as the only president in history to be impeached twice,” Keck said.
“It has to be a matter for the historical record to say that inciting a mob to attack the Congress and try to prevent them from certifying the results of an election is unacceptable behaviour.”
Comments
Post a Comment